Pacifism is popular. Many hold that war is unnecessary, since peaceful means of resolving conflict are always available, if only we had the will to look for them. Or they believe that war is wicked, essentially involving hatred of the enemy and carelessness of human life. Or they posit the absolute right of innocent individuals not to be deliberately killed, making it impossible to justify war in practice. Peace, however, is not simple. Peace for some can leave others at peace to perpetrate mass atrocity. What was peace for the West in 1994 was not peace for the Tutsis of Rwanda. Therefore, against the virus of wishful thinking, anti-military caricature, and the domination of moral deliberation by rights-talk In Defence of War asserts that belligerency can be morally justified, even though tragic and morally flawed. Recovering the Christian tradition of reflection running from Augustine to Grotius, this book affirms aggressive war in punishment of grave injustice. Morally realistic in adhering to universal moral principles, it recognises that morality can trump legality, justifying military intervention even in transgression of positive international law-as in the case of Kosovo. Less cynical and more empirically realistic about human nature than Hobbes, it holds that nations desire to be morally virtuous and right, and not only to be safe and fat. And aspiring to practical realism, it argues that love and the doctrine of double effect can survive combat; and that the constraints of proportionality, while real, are nevertheless sufficiently permissive to encompass Britain's belligerency in 1914-18. Finally, in a painstaking analysis of the Iraq invasion of 2003, In Defence of War culminates in an account of how the various criteria of just war should be thought together. It also concludes that, all things considered, the invasion was justified.
Introduction: Against the Virus of Wishful Thinking ; 1. Against Christian Pacifism ; 2. Love in War ; 3. The Principle of Double Effect: Can it Survive Combat? ; 4. Proportionality: Lessons from the Somme and the First World War ; 5. Against Legal Positivism and Liberal Individualism ; 6. On Not Always Giving the Devil Benefit of Law: Legality, Morality, and Kosovo ; 7. Constructing Judgement: The Case of Iraq ; Conclusion ; Bibliography
Anyone who cares about questions of war and peace - and who wishes to think deeply about how to assess those questions morally - should buy and promptly read Nigel Biggar's In Defense of War. Damon Linker, The Week Every once in a while, a truly special book comes down the theological pike ... Now comes Nigel Biggar's In Defence of War. Biggar's careful moral reasoning offers a model that, if followed, would deepen and mature the Christian discussion of the ethics of war and peace. First Things Magazine Biggar's historical sensitivity and his testimony from the ground is indeed one of the great virtues of his book. Add to this his careful and sophisticated arguments, his creativity, and his beautiful prose, and the result is what may well become a classic book about the justice of war. At the very least, holders of rival contemporary views will not be able to proceed ahead without first confronting Biggar's arguments. Dan Philpott, The Tablet Biggar's book is a fine polemic, offering a splendidly robust and well-argued defence of war, that deserves to be widely read. David Fisher, International Affairs It employs an extensive knowledge of military history, exhibits expertise in a theological literature unknown to many, and articulates a most perceptive critique of prominent secular accounts. Biggars considered assessments of particular military conflicts are sophisticated, controversial, and nuanced. If you choose to read only one of the very large number of treatments of the morality of war that have recently seen their way into print, you could not do better than take up this book. Christopher Eberle, Associate Professor of Philosophy, United States Naval Academy This is a highly original and significant contribution to the discussion of the morality of war. Biggar has read extraordinarily widely, uses his sources masterfully, and writes both beautifully and persuasively. I have forty-odd books treating just war on my shelves, and this book stands with the very best. I rank it with Ramseys work of the 1960s, and that work has had a deep and lasting influence. This is a seriously good piece of work. James Turner Johnson, Distinguished Professor of Religion and Associate of the Graduate Program in Political Sciences, Rutgers University Nigel Biggar has written a truly valuable book. Rebelling against the 'wishful thinking' that there can be a pacifist solution to all conflicts between nations, he draws on the resources of both Christian moral theology and secular moral thinking to defend the legitimacy of military force in a variety of real world situationsa defense that is rich in detail about actual combat (the awfulness of which he does not minimize). The clarity of the writing and the scope and power of the authors mind advances the conversation in a way that will be instructive to all those interested in the topic of war and will cause all thoughtful readers, whether inclined to pacifism or not, to rethink their own positions. Jeffrie G. Murphy, Arizona State University Drawing on the Just War Tradition tradition, as well as on a wealth of reading in contemporary law, international relations and military history, Nigel Biggar crafts an impressive and thought provoking defence of the moral permissibility, even perhaps sometimes the moral necessity of war, both in general terms and in the context of three specific modern contexts: the First World War, The NATO intervention in Kosovo and the US-led invasion of Iraq. Deeply felt and Meticulously argued, this book should be on the reading list of all, Christian or not, who are genuinely concerned with the ethical dilemmas of war in the 20th and 21st centuries. Nick Rennger, University of St Andrews Not since Paul Ramsey's The Just War almost half a century ago has a Christian theologian writing about war accomplished so much, so lucidly, in a single volume. Biggar is in full command of the theological, philosophical, and legal debates around just war, and engages in all these debates in powerful and illuminating ways. More than that, however, he tests his abstract proposals agains a series of richly detailed, historically grounded case studies-Kosovo, the 2003 Iraq Invasion, and the Somme-in sustained dialectical manner, and uses them to excellent illustrative effect. Theologically profound, philosophically acute, legally astute, politically canny, and historically aware, this book becomes at once the work on Christian just war theory. Charles Mathewes, University of Virginia A book that should sharpen the thinking of other theologians venturing into this crucial, and tragically still topical, moral minefield. Theology If such people wish to seek whether and how war might be justified, and when it might be necessary, this book is worth their time. National Review Biggars careful moral reasoning offers a model that, if followed, would deepen and mature the Christian discussion of the ethics of war and peace. And, if I may say, his book ought especially to be read by those who, at first blush, will be shocked or even appalled by its title. George Weigel, First Things, Biggar's arguments are carefully researched and meticulously argued. He analyzes the most important classical and contemporary theological and philosophical literature, and he draws insights from novels, movies, diaries, interviews and personal visits to war memorials. His case for just war is deeply heartfelt. Even readers who remain unconvinced will value his book for challenging them to think more clearly about war and peace. Christian Century,